Pilot Sprint Menu

Pilot Sprint Menu

Use this page when a buyer, partner, investor, or founder asks what the first paid step should be.

The menu is quote-first. It does not publish fixed public pricing. Each pilot is scoped around surfaces, risk, access needs, turnaround, and whether the work is advisory, implementation, or a productization conversation.

Primary contact path:

• https://faithcheltenham.com/contact/

Do not send credentials, private source, customer data, app passwords, signed URLs, private keys, or production logs in the first message.

Pick One First Step

Website Trust Sprint

Best for a business, founder, creator, or organization whose public site looks weaker than the actual work.

Use it when the site has:

• generic or repeated visuals
• outdated project pages
• unclear calls to action
• weak proof and trust signals
• images that feel draft-like, broken, empty, or off-brand
• good work hidden behind poor presentation

Pilot deliverables:

• public route and image audit
• keep/change/remove list
• first-batch replacement plan
• source and usage boundary notes
• CTA and trust-signal cleanup recommendations
• publish-ready handoff or guarded implementation path where supported

Good first message:

Send the website URL, the pages that bother you most, launch deadline, and whether you want audit only or implementation support.

GitHub Trust Sprint

Best for a private or semi-private technical product that needs public credibility without giving away the private engine.

Use it when the repo or public surface needs:

• clearer README
• public/private boundary language
• better product positioning
• license and commercial-use clarity
• safer screenshots or diagrams
• contact and commercial CTAs
• proof that the project exists without exposing sensitive implementation

Pilot deliverables:

• public/private boundary review
• README and commercial CTA upgrade
• docs structure recommendation
• secret and private-file risk notes
• public-safe proof links
• launch receipt

Good first message:

Send the public repo URL if one exists, what the tool does, what must stay private, and what kind of buyer or partner should understand it.

Brand System Audit Sprint

Best for a founder or team whose public materials feel inconsistent across website, GitHub, social/profile pages, docs, and pitch surfaces.

Use it when the brand has:

• mixed visual language
• unclear tone
• weak audience fit
• inconsistent calls to action
• trust problems across surfaces
• AI visuals that do not match the real brand

Pilot deliverables:

• brand-fit map
• voice and visual notes
• rejected pattern list
• accessibility and trust review
• next creative batch brief
• buyer-facing positioning notes

Good first message:

Send the public links, who needs to trust the brand, what feels wrong, and examples of visual/copy directions you like or do not want repeated.

Local AI Workflow Sprint

Best for operators who want AI help without losing control of files, receipts, reviews, and publishing authority.

Use it when the workflow needs:

• repeatable task packets
• local-first file organization
• approval checkpoints
• receipts and logs
• public/private separation
• safer handoff from idea to asset to publish

Pilot deliverables:

• workflow map
• folder and receipt structure
• task packet template
• safe automation rules
• owner review checklist
• training walkthrough

Good first message:

Send the repeatable workflow you want to improve, the tools you already use, and what should never be automated.

Provenance And Protected File Sprint

Best for creators, founders, researchers, and technologists who need better authorship, original-file, disclosure, and review records.

Use it when the work involves:

• original files that must remain unchanged
• selective disclosure
• private/public proof boundaries
• authorship and ownership records
• archive or diligence readiness
• tamper-evident local receipts

Pilot deliverables:

• provenance needs map
• public/private disclosure boundary
• local receipt structure
• original-file handling notes
• proof-language review
• TheFAYTH File Type concept walkthrough where appropriate

Good first message:

Send the kinds of files involved, who needs to review them, what can be disclosed publicly, and what must remain private.

What Happens After A Pilot

A pilot can lead to:

• a larger implementation project
• a monthly public-surface improvement lane
• a product packaging sprint
• licensing or partnership conversation
• investor/customer diligence support
• a local workflow buildout

Buyer Fit

Best fit:

• you have a real public surface
• there is a trust, clarity, workflow, or proof problem
• you can name the outcome you want
• you respect public/private boundaries
• you are ready to scope the first step

Poor fit:

• vague unpaid strategy requests
• credential sharing in the first message
• requests to expose private engine source
• unclear ownership
• no decision-maker or sponsor
• public claims that are not true yet

Ask For A Scope

Use the contact page and say which pilot you want to discuss.

Include:

• your public URL or repo
• desired outcome
• deadline or launch window
• whether you want audit, implementation, demo, licensing, or partnership
• budget range if known